Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Meteor grey |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a general score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than Moto X Style's 74.1 general score. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's body is newer and thinner than the Moto X Style's, but it is noticeably heavier. The Motorola Moto X Style has a little more vivid screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X Style, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a lot better camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a bigger aperture, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.