Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView has a score of 76.4, which is a bit better than the Moto X Style's global score of 74.1. Nokia 9 PureView is a notably newer device, and it's also incredibly thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto X Style. The Nokia 9 PureView features a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a quite larger display and a quite better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The Nokia 9 PureView features a bit faster processor than Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Moto X Style features a bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto X Style also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Nokia 9 PureView features slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Nokia 9 PureView counts with just a bit longer battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 3320mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.