Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has an overall score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than the Moto X Style's 74.1 general score. Although Nokia XR20 is much heavier than the Moto X Style, it's a little thinner and also way newer. The Nokia XR20 and Moto X Style count with quite similar displays, because although the Nokia XR20 has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display.
Nokia XR20 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. The Nokia XR20 features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Moto X Style, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Nokia XR20 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and video, a much more MP camera in the back, a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Nokia XR20 counts with a superior battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 54 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.