Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X Style, getting a general score of 75.8 against 74.1. Nubia Red Magic 3S's body is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than the Motorola Moto X Style. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a faster CPU than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 9 GB more RAM and 2 more processing cores.
The Moto X Style has a slightly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels count in each screen inch. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a way better battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior camera than Moto X Style, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.