Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G is slightly better than Moto X Style, with a global score of 77.4 against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's body is incredibly newer and much thinner than the Moto X Style's, but it's also heavier. The Moto X Style counts with a really superior performance than Galaxy A15 5G, although it has 2 less processing cores and a lower amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A15 5G features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Galaxy A15 5G has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X Style, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a superior battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G takes slightly better pictures and videos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.