Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-01 | -- |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A16 5G is slightly better than Motorola Moto X Style, getting a global score of 76.2 against 74.1. Galaxy A16 5G's body is heavier but extremely thinner than Motorola Moto X Style. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Moto X Style, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a way worse pixels count per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto X Style has a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and less cores (but faster).
The Moto X Style counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a much worse resolution camera in the back and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video. The Galaxy A16 5G has a way better battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.