Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A20s is just a bit better than Moto X Style, with a global score of 77 against 74.1. The Galaxy A20s design is incredibly newer and way thinner than Moto X Style's, but it's also a little bit heavier. The Motorola Moto X Style features a brighter display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A20s features a bit better performance than Moto X Style, because it has a higher number of 1800 MHz cores and more RAM. The Galaxy A20s features a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Moto X Style, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A20s also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A20s features better battery performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto X Style takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images, it also counts with a camera with a lot higher 21 MP resolution, a much better video quality and a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.