Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto X Style, having a general score of 76.1 against 74.1. Galaxy A22's design is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner, but also a bit heavier than Motorola Moto X Style. Galaxy A22 features a bit better processor than Moto X Style, because it has more RAM memory and 2 more cpu cores.
The Moto X Style counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater display density and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Moto X Style shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a camera with way less megapixels and a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy A22 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto X Style, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A22 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto X Style counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.