Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the Moto X Style, with a 79.9 score against 74.1. Galaxy A25 5G's construction is noticeably newer and a lot thinner, but also a little heavier than Moto X Style. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better looking screen than Moto X Style, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger display.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Moto X Style features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM and lesser cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.