Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30s has an overall score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than Moto X Style's 74.1 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A30s is a way newer device, and it's also much thinner and a bit lighter than the Moto X Style. Motorola Moto X Style features a better looking screen than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a way higher pixels quantity per inch of screen.
Galaxy A30s has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X Style, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. Galaxy A30s has a bit faster processor than Moto X Style, because it has 2 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto X Style captures a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in low-light situations and a lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A30s features better battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.