Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 LTE Only is better than Motorola Moto X Style, having a global score of 82 against 74.1. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a a lot newer cellphone, and it's also much lighter and notably thinner than the Motorola Moto X Style. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a bit better looking display than Moto X Style, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a bit superior processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only captures just a bit better photos and videos than Moto X Style, because although it has a much smaller sensor which offers a lot worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a very superior battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.