Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto X Style's 74.1 general score. The Galaxy A35 5G design is newer and noticeably thinner, but also heavier than Motorola Moto X Style. Motorola Moto X Style features a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cores.
Moto X Style counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a superior camera than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a back facing camera with lot more MP, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and video and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a really longer battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.