Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is a lot better than Moto X Style, having a overall score of 91.1 against 74.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A52s is a bit heavier than the Moto X Style, it's way thinner and a lot newer. Motorola Moto X Style features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A52s has just a little better performance than Moto X Style, because it has more processing cores and more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52s has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52s takes much clearer photos and videos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also has a bigger camera aperture, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality and a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A52s features a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.