Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-01 | -- |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | -- |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) is slightly better than the Moto X Style, getting a score of 78.7 against 74.1. Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) is a incredibly lighter and extremely thinner cellphone than the Moto X Style. Motorola Moto X Style counts with a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), although it has 5 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores (although they are faster).
Motorola Moto X Style features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels amount in each inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light environments, a way larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) features a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) features a superior battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.