Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A6 has a score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than Moto X Style's 74.1 global score. Galaxy A6's construction is way newer, a lot thinner and just a bit lighter than the Moto X Style. The Motorola Moto X Style features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A6, although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have a 3 GB RAM.
Motorola Moto X Style features a better looking screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560, a little larger display and a much better display pixel density. The Moto X Style has just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 272 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
Moto X Style counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures and video in low light environments, it also counts with a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs, a much better resolution camera and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A6 and Motorola Moto X Style count with quite similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.