Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto X Style, having a general score of 76.9 against 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy A70 design is newer and noticeably thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Motorola Moto X Style. The Moto X Style has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel number per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Moto X Style, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy A70 counts with a little bit better performance than Moto X Style, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Moto X Style shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto X Style also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.