Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Motorola Moto X Style, having a overall score of 92.9 against 74.1. The Galaxy A71 5G UW body is incredibly newer and thinner, but also just a little heavier than Motorola Moto X Style. The Moto X Style features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher screen density.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a better camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot better resolution back-facing camera, a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X Style, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.