Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-09-01 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C5 has a score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto X Style's 74.1 general score. The Galaxy C5 is a newer phone, and it's also extremely lighter and way thinner than the Motorola Moto X Style. The Motorola Moto X Style has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy C5, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores.
Moto X Style counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a little higher display pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a bit larger screen. The Motorola Moto X Style and the Galaxy C5 both have very similar memory for games and applications, they have equal 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 128 GB.
Moto X Style has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting images and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. Moto X Style has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.