Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the Moto X Style's global score of 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy M20 body is noticeably newer and incredibly thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Moto X Style. Galaxy M20 counts with a bit faster processor than Moto X Style, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Moto X Style has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Motorola Moto X Style shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better video resolution, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy M20 features more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy M20 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M20 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.