Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is much better than Moto X Style, having a global score of 87.7 against 74.1. Even though Galaxy M51 is somewhat heavier than the Moto X Style, it's thinner and also incredibly newer. Moto X Style features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixel density.
Galaxy M51 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 takes better videos and photos than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos, a way bigger sensor and a camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a really longer battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.