Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2022-04-07 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M53 5G has a general score of 76.7, which is just a bit better than the Moto X Style's general score of 74.1. The Galaxy M53 5G body is newer, just a little lighter and thinner than Moto X Style. The Moto X Style has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels count per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy M53 5G has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto X Style features a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy M53 5G features a superior battery life than Moto X Style, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy M53 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Moto X Style, because although it has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a way worse image and video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better images in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.