Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-01 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than Moto X Style, with an 80.4 score against 74.1. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a newer phone, and it's also extremely thinner and a bit lighter than the Moto X Style. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit better looking screen than Moto X Style. Both of them have the same screen pixels density, a display with the same size and the same 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more cores. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto X Style has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto X Style also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera and a larger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.