Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is way better than Moto X Style's overall score of 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a a lot newer device, and it is also notably thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto X Style. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better processor than Moto X Style, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto X Style counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display pixel density. The Moto X Style takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a way tinier aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto X Style also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.