Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the Motorola Moto X Style, getting a general score of 86.2 against 74.1. Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is heavier than Motorola Moto X Style, it's noticeably thinner and way newer. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit more powerful processor than Moto X Style, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more cores.
Moto X Style counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better display pixels density. Galaxy Note10 Lite has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto X Style, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's camera is just as good as the camera in Moto X Style, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a camera with a lot lower resolution, a smaller sensor offering a worse image quality and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a superior battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.