Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 is slightly better than the Moto X Style, with a 77.7 score against 74.1. The Galaxy Note3 construction is a bit lighter and notably thinner than Moto X Style, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. The Galaxy Note3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Style, although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount.
Moto X Style has a bit better display than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a same size display, the Moto X Style also has a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. The Moto X Style features a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto X Style also has a SD card slot that holds up to 128 GB.
Galaxy Note3 counts with just a little better battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has a 3200mAh battery size. The Moto X Style features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Moto X Style also has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot better 21 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.