Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-01 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto X Style's 74.1 general score. The Galaxy Note7 is a newer phone, and it is also much thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto X Style. Galaxy Note7 has a screen that is very similar to the screen in Motorola Moto X Style, both have the same count of pixels per screen inch, exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a screen with the same size.
The Galaxy Note7 features slightly more storage to store more games and applications than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note7 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has less processing cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note7 has a bit superior battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has a 17 percent larger battery capacity. Motorola Moto X Style takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking better quality photographs and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.