Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than Moto X Style, getting a 98 score against 74.1. Even though Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is somewhat heavier than Moto X Style, it's noticeably thinner and way newer. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster).
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a larger display. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto X Style, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures a lot better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a larger camera sensor shooting better quality photographs, a bigger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments and a much better video definition.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 67% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.