Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2015-09-01 | -- |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S23 is slightly better than the Moto X Style, having a 77.9 score against 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy S23 body is a lot thinner and notably lighter than the Moto X Style. The Motorola Moto X Style counts with a better screen than Galaxy S23, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola Moto X Style features a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S23, although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S23 features a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto X Style, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S23 features greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity. The Moto X Style features a bit better camera than Galaxy S23, although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lot worse quality images and videos, a much worse 21 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.