Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport is a bit better than the Motorola Moto X Style, having a general score of 77.8 against 74.1. Galaxy S5 Sport's body is notably thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto X Style, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit more vivid display than Moto X Style, although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a little bit lower pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a little smaller display.
The Moto X Style features much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 128 GB, the Moto X Style also has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto X Style, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Moto X Style features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 7 percent more battery size. The Motorola Moto X Style features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto X Style also has a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low light environments, a way higher 21 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.