| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2015-04-10 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.59 x 2.76 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 4.66 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic | Aluminium and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Galaxy S6 Edge is better than Moto X Style, having a score of 85.7 against 74.1. The Galaxy S6 Edge is a noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner device than Moto X Style, although both were released only a couple months apart. Galaxy S6 Edge features a better processing power than Moto X Style, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy S6 Edge also has an additional GPU, a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a 64-bit processing unit.
Galaxy S6 Edge features a better screen than Moto X Style, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, the Galaxy S6 Edge also counts with a just a bit higher pixel number in each inch of display. The Moto X Style features a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Edge, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto X Style also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a lot better 21 MP resolution back camera.
The Galaxy S6 Edge has a little bit more memory for games and applications than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto X Style counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S6 Edge, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.