Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a bit better than Moto X Style, getting a 77.6 score against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's construction is notably newer and thinner, but also way heavier than the Moto X Style. The Motorola Moto X Style has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto X Style counts with a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster).
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a way better battery life than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity. Moto X Style takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited situations and a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.