Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than Motorola Moto X Style, with an 85.6 score against 74.1. Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is newer and a lot thinner, but also a bit heavier than Motorola Moto X Style. Moto X Style counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit superior CPU than Moto X Style, because it has more RAM and more processing cores.
Moto X Style has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light captures, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little longer battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.