Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Moto X Style, having a overall score of 90.6 against 74.1. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is heavier than Moto X Style, it's a lot thinner and extremely newer. The Moto X Style has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, it also counts with a greater display density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a more powerful processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto X Style shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture and a camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.