Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto X Style's 74.1 global score. TCL 20 Pro 5G's construction is newer and thinner than the Motorola Moto X Style's, but it's a little heavier. Motorola Moto X Style has a little sharper display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a little better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 2 more processing cores. TCL 20 Pro 5G has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Moto X Style, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a better camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a much more megapixels back facing camera, a larger sensor taking better quality photos and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.