Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a score of 82.9, which is better than the Motorola Moto X Style's 74.1 score. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a much newer and extremely thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto X Style, although it is somewhat heavier. The Moto X Style has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a slightly better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a better CPU than Moto X Style, because it has 2 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features greater battery duration than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has faster video frame rates, a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos, a larger camera aperture to capture better photography in low light situations and a lot more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.