Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is much better than Moto X Style, having an 88.3 score against 74.1. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a noticeably newer and a bit thinner phone than Moto X Style, but it is also heavier. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a bit more vivid screen than Moto X Style, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a quite superior performance than Moto X Style, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 shoots better pictures and videos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has faster video frame rate, a larger back-facing camera sensor, a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.