Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a general score of 90, which is a lot better than the Moto X Style's 74.1 global score. Although Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is heavier than Moto X Style, it's thinner and also newer. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a bit more vivid display than Moto X Style, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger display. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro takes way better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a lot better video definition, a lot better 108 MP resolution camera, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in low light environments.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a little bit more memory for applications and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.