Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-09-01 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.09 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus is a bit better than the Moto X Style, with a 78.1 score against 74.1. The Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus body is newer, incredibly thinner and just a little lighter than the Moto X Style. The Moto X Style features a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Moto X Style also has a greater pixel amount in each inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with 3 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus features a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Moto X Style, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus has superior battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 3800mAh battery size. Motorola Moto X Style captures a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a same size aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto X Style also has a much bigger back camera sensor and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.