Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| 2015-09-01 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 6 is slightly better than Moto X Style, getting a overall score of 76.5 against 74.1. Xiaomi Mi 6's design is newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto X Style. The Xiaomi Mi 6 has a bit better processing power than Moto X Style, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster).
Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with a bit better looking screen than Moto X Style, although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, a little bit inferior pixels count in each inch in the display and a quite smaller display. The Motorola Moto X Style features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Mi 6 has just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has a 3350mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.