Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.80 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2244 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3120mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 8 SE is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X Style, with a overall score of 75.9 against 74.1. The Xiaomi Mi 8 SE design is notably newer, just a little lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto X Style. The Xiaomi Mi 8 SE has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2244 and a just a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Motorola Moto X Style features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto X Style also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 128 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 8 SE has a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 3 GB more RAM and 2 more processing cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 8 SE features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 4% more battery size. The Moto X Style captures clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto X Style also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.