Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has an overall score of 81.4, which is a little bit better than the Moto X Style's global score of 74.1. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's body is incredibly newer, somewhat lighter and notably thinner than Moto X Style. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit better screen than Moto X Style, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit inferior pixel amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos, a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a slightly bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit longer battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has a 3070mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.