Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is much better than Moto X Style, having a general score of 82.7 against 74.1. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's body is extremely newer and a lot thinner, but just a bit heavier than Moto X Style. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Moto X Style counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a much more MP back-facing camera, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality and a larger aperture.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X Style, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features superior battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.