Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi A3 is slightly better than the Moto X Style, having a 79.2 score against 74.1. The Xiaomi Mi A3 design is way newer, notably thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto X Style. The Motorola Moto X Style counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a much higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Mi A3 features a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 2 more processing cores. Xiaomi Mi A3 features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with longer battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has a 34 percent bigger battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi A3 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a much more mega-pixels camera, a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.