Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| 2015-09-01 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Max has a score of 77.5, which is a little bit better than the Moto X Style's global score of 74.1. Even though Xiaomi Mi Max and Moto X Style were only released 9 months apart, Xiaomi Mi Max's construction is way thinner but also somewhat heavier. The Moto X Style features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Max counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a higher number of cores and 1 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Max has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Moto X Style takes a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto X Style also has a much better 21 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The Xiaomi Mi Max has a much better battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has a 4850mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.