Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| 2015-09-01 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.3 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto X Style, getting a 77.5 score against 74.1. Even though Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto X Style, it's extremely thinner and also newer. Moto X Style has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per screen inch.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto X Style, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 128 GB, the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a bit faster processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a way better battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has 5300mAh of battery capacity. Moto X Style has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto X Style also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.