Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is much better than Moto X Style's 74.1 global score. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is just a little bit heavier than Moto X Style, it's noticeably thinner and noticeably newer. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 2 more cores.
The Motorola Moto X Style counts with a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per display inch. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a very superior storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little longer battery life than Moto X Style, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola Moto X Style features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a larger camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.