Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is much better than the Motorola Moto X Style, having a score of 83.8 against 74.1. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's body is noticeably newer and notably thinner than Motorola Moto X Style's, although it is somewhat heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit superior processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little lower pixel number per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger display. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto X Style and Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 count with very similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a much worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution camera, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a smaller sensor taking worse quality videos and images, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.