Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has an overall score of 80.6, which is just a bit better than Moto X Style's global score of 74.1. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite body is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than the Moto X Style. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a little more vivid display than Moto X Style, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite shoots much better photographs and videos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Moto X Style has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto X Style also has an external memory slot that admits up to 128 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 75% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.