Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is just a bit better than the Moto X Style, with a overall score of 78.7 against 74.1. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is a a lot newer and way thinner cellphone than Moto X Style, although it's also somewhat heavier. Moto X Style features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better pixel amount in each inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 1 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a way better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.