Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a global score of 78.3, which is just a bit better than Moto X Style's score of 74.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is a extremely thinner device than Moto X Style, but both of them weight 6.31oz. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a little more vivid screen than Moto X Style, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a greater storage to install applications and games than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto X Style has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality photographs and videos, a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and a way less megapixels camera. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a very superior battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.